Review writing must be approached responsibly, as it affects the assessment on defense. The review significantly influences the assessment on the defense. To raise your chances at a high grade, I urge you to consider turning to outside companies, for that offer impeccable writing assistance. This is the main source of information about the work for the members of the commission. As you know, the reviewer is a specialist in the field of the stated topic with a scientific degree, so he can evaluate the work professionally. That is why the review is taken so seriously by the committee. However, if you are analyzing your own work, do not over-praise it. As https://www.paytowritepaper.com/case-study/ writers will tell you, this only leads to a disappointment for professors and lowers your grade. Disadvantages will come up anyway, and it will immediately become clear how the review was written. Important! Do not be discouraged if the review contains not very good reviews about the work, they can always be overridden by a high-quality presentation at the defense. Common mistakes of reviewers Students that struggle with academic writing a lot might find a lot of use out a team of writing experts. A list of these errors will be an important tip for novice reviewers: Turning analysis into a simple retelling of the content. Too long introduction (story about the topic of work), which "selects" the volume intended for the analysis of more important points. Insufficient argumentation of their point of view (especially with regard to shortcomings). Contradictions in the analysis, for example, the analysis says one thing, but the general assessment is completely different, or there is one key thesis, and further analysis does not correspond to it. There is no assessment of the quality of the design of the work, the features of the disclosure of the topic from the point of view of style, structure. There is no characteristic of practical value, originality, or it is mentioned in passing. The peer review of a master's thesis should be based on the principle of objectivity, and everything else is attached to it - the content, structure, and technique of the review.